Anthony Kolbus
1/10/14
5th hour
Mrs. Kloser
Outline
In the past
20 years high school students, and school boards have struggled with the
decision to read and teach the novel The
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn because of the explicit content it contains
and also because of the use of the word “nigger”.
Everyone
that has read the novel can agree that the word “nigger” is a terrible word
that should have never existed in the first place. This is why there is such
debate to have students in schools read the book at all or read a censored
version of the story. But in that scenario I would ask the obvious question
first: perhaps there is another story that the students could read that they
could essentially learn the same things that without being exposed to that
explicit content.
On the
other hand, in modern times it is a good thing that people are shocked by the
offensiveness of the word because it reminds everyone of the way our society
was during the beginning of our country and that we share that past.
In my opinion I think that the word
“nigger” should not be removed or replaced with the word “slave” because the
two words in now way share the same meaning or any similarities whatsoever and
are therefore interchangeable. For example, in the novel, there is a scene in
the story where the main character Huck plays a cruel trick on Jim, but then
feels sorry for his actions and says “It was fifteen minutes before I could work myself
up to go and humble myself to a nigger” (Twain 55). Here Huck is not saying he
is humbling himself to a slave or Jim, but he means really means to say a
“nigger” because that word is much more powerful and demeaning than saying that
he is humbling himself to a slave. And Twain intended it to be that way because
if he had wanted to say a slave he would have said slave, the same way a
painter would have chosen the color blue instead of red for example. Changing
an author’s work by removing a word that plays a very important role in the
story would change the entire effect of the story.
However, most people are shocked by the word
because they believe there is no use for the word. Most audiences see the word
being there as unnecessary, but even more specifically because it offends many
African Americans too. For example, a law professor named Paul Butler wrote to
the New York Times saying that while he read the novel “white
kids going out of their way to say “Nigger Jim” and the teacher’s tortured
explanation that Twain’s “nigger” didn’t really mean nigger, or meant it
ironically, or historically, or symbolically”(Butler). But this is an example of how it
was the school’s fault that allowed its own students that misused the word
“nigger”, which in turn led to an entire group of students that misunderstood
the “historical” and “symbolic” significance of the novel. Unfortunately this
in turn affected this man who is still scared by the improper use of the word.
Many audiences
believe that mark Twain is racist for using “nigger” so blatantly throughout
the story. In Chadwick Joshua’s book “The Jim Dilemma: Reading Race in
Huckleberry Finn” there is a section of the book where he talks about a
specific part in Huckleberry Jim, where Jim helped a little boy after he had
been shot during his escape, and all the “white” people yell at Jim and call him
“nigger” and Chadwick Joshua points out that while they yell at Jim, he shows
his humanity to them by staying silent, “The mob’s response after hearing from
the doctor about Jim’s unquestionable humanity adds that parodic satiric spice that pervades this novel”(Joshua 129). This
shows that Twain is not racist because even he sees Jim as a human.
Now going back to the
question of should this book be taught in schools because of the explicit
content, I would say that this book is no where near a children’s book, and
that the school better have a very good reason for choosing this book of all
books, because this book is almost the equivalent to that of an R-rated film. That
being said I would say this book is only for Juniors in high school at the
least. Not at all appropriate for younger children. Also you have to look at
what you want to teach from a story and if the only thing that is going to
happen from reading this book are debates about the word “nigger” than there is
no need to read it at all.
Works Cited
Twain,
Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Edited by Shelley Fisher Fiskin; introduction
by Toni Morrison, afterword by Victor Doyno. New York: Oxford University Press,
1996.
Chadwick-
Joshua, Jocelyn. The Jim Dilemma: Reading Race in Huckleberry Finn. Jackson:
University Press of Mississippi, 1998.
Butler,
Paul. "Why Read That Book." Why Read That Book (2006): n. pag.
Web.
i agree with you that slave and nigger are not interchangeable words they imply two different meanings. that being said however nigger is still not an acceptable choice it is this very day considered very offensive. this novel has offended many readers like Paul Butler who have been offered tortured explanations. the reason these explanations are so terrible is because they trying to explain away the meaning of a word. this word is offensive and twain meant it to be offensive. as such twain failed to make up for the offensive word with a good moral change in our main character huck. throughout the book huck calls jim a nigger. the book is written in a way that makes huck appear to be the author. if huck is really writing this story after the book is over he should not be saying nigger. one of the most pivotal moments is when huck "humbles [himself] to a nigger" if huck has truly grown morally he should know better than to call jim a "nigger". this in fact points to the reason that huck sees jim as "white inside" (twain 245). this shows us very clearly huck has not changed because he writes a book where jim is "nigger" who is "white inside". twain fails to give huck the strong moral change needed to justify the n-word.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with parts of this. One point being that "nigger" and "slave" are not equal words...I read in one of the New York Times articles that authors plan out how they are going to present their novels, exactly which words they are going to say and where they're going to place them very carefully. I think that changing the word from "nigger" to "slave" takes away from the effect Twain wanted the book to have on whichever audience he intended.
ReplyDeleteHowever, your closing statement is a little unsettling to me because Huck brings so much to the plate! I mean, for one english class and the point of reading in school is to spark discussion and get people talking about how the book made them "feel". That's exactly what is going on now...the controversy of Huck Finn is what makes the novel such a masterpiece.
I agree with you Blowbus. The words nigger and slave are 2 completely different meanings and effects. Effects that could change the emotion of the story. Also you must have a certain maturity level where you have to notice that Huck has no intent of being racist, but to show that Huck becomes a new character by accepting Jim as an intelligent human being.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with some aspects of your arguments. First off slave and n-word are no where near interchangeable because one word carries way more hatred than the other. The censoring of that word or of any other questionable scenes of the story would make the book not even worth the time to study and read because there would not be the history there to learn about. I understand where you are coming from that last argument- it is a great possibility that if the teacher does not understand the severity of the novel or even just the 'n-word' the topics of conversation in the classroom can become noneducational and mean-spirited. However, if the teacher and classroom understand that the novel they are about to begin will test not only their minds but their ways of thinking, as well as their perception of the past and current world today; then the novel becomes a great learning tool.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Anthony. The n word is a terrible word that shouldn't have existed. But since it did exist, and since it was so popular in our country's history i think that it is important that we keep that word in the book. you're right too, because a slave could be anyone. but a "nigger" can only be a black person. i also agree that only mature audiences should read this. for us, i think that it is appropriate to read in class but i wouldn't go giving this to 8th graders, or even freshmen
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree. The word "nigger" IS offensive and terrible. I think that this is one of the reasons its used. It shows us how powerful the word can be, and how regularly the word was used back then, and how they didn't even realize how offensive it could be. I also agree when you say "slave" and "nigger" are not the same. "Slave" is neutral term, but "nigger" is extremely derogatory, and can strike real pain.
ReplyDelete